123sxRPg69
(Reporter Wang Wei) "rich" Jia met with only half of Cagney and Lacey flash marriage, bride price of 15 million yuan to the other side and a Audi,http://www13.plala.or.jp/white_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi, less than six months can Naoqi divorce. After the Court of First Instance judgment, Jia bride price payment was not only recover,http://aws.keicode.com/aws/ses-dev-tool-scripts.php, but also to pay Cagney and Lacey cars.
Reporters learned that morning,spaccio woolrich,http://www.stressawaybridal.com/forum/profile.php?id=87394, the second instance court the facts are unclear,tn femme pas cher, the grounds of insufficient evidence,woolrich uomo, the case was remanded.
Lavish send huge dowry and Audi
24-year-old Jia home in Hebei, is a truly a "rich second generation" generous economic conditions.
May 18, 2010,http://sportsfan.jpn.org/cgi-kban/sunbbs.cgi?mode=form&no=19&page=2, Jia and just get to know only half of Chan for the marriage registration. Ms. Chen is a working in Beijing Jinghua.
September 2010, the two requirements in accordance with the house, ready to go through and then go through the wedding engagement party,peuterey prezzi, wedding set in, Ms. Chen Jia family paid 38,000 yuan bride price, then gave the travel expenses, wedding advances, buy LV, Gucci bags, etc. These bride Jia spent a total of 15 million yuan.
In addition, in June 2010, Jia's father also invested 490,000 yuan to buy an Audi car without thinking will be registered in the name of the daughter Chan.
Wedding parties organized conflict
In January 2011, in the arrangement of the wedding issue, conflict broke out between the two sides. Marriage ceremony could not be held and brought before the court.
Jia believed that he was not between Chan and deep emotional foundation, the number of married couples did not build,http://www.ajknagoya.com, so he sued for divorce and requested the return of the family Chan donated money gift.
Chan agreed to divorce, but does not agree with the return of these bride,http://crosstowncookers.org, while she asked, split with her husband,http://wx.jazzsynth.com/wxcgi/kizai/sunkizai.cgi?mode=form&no=64&page=2", Mr. Jia's common property. She said that Audi is Jia father bought for himself, once divorced,http://www.thedesertmoonreview.com, Audi let myself away.
Court of First Instance held that the bride price items and money belonging to Ms. Chen Jia family gift, and personal property belonging to Ms. Chen, while Audi is jointly owned property, but did not tell Ms. Chen Jia in the case, the Audi 36 million price to sell, intentionally embezzled sum of money, so Jia sum of money may not be divided.
According to the court verdict,scarpe hogan, Ms. Chen Jia payment shall cars. After the announcement, Jia appeal.
Second instance court held that the original verdict, the facts wrong, or the original verdict, the facts are unclear, insufficient evidence, then ruling to revoke the first instance verdict, the case remanded.
